Placenta previa

Changed by Tim Luijkx, 17 Sep 2015

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Title was changed:
Placenta praeviaprevia

Updates to Article Attributes

Title was changed:
Placenta previapraevia
Body was changed:

Placenta previapraevia is a term given to an abnormally low position of the placenta such that it lies close to, or covers the internal cervical os. 

It is a potentially life-threatening condition to both mother and infant, which may result in exsanguination. As such, antenatal diagnosis is essential to adequately prepare for childbirth.  

Pathology

The term "placenta previapraevia" covers to a spectrum of anomalies and results from partial or total insertion of the placenta into the lower uterine segment.

Classification

PreviaPraevia is divided into 4 grades depending on the relationship and distance to the internal cervical os:

  • grade I: low lying placenta: placenta lies in lower uterine segment but its lower edge does not abut the internal cervical os (i.e lower edge 0.5-5.0 cm from internal os).
  • grade II: marginal previapraevia: placental tissue reaches the margin of the internal cervical os, but does not cover it
  • grade III: partial previapraevia: placenta partially covers the internal cervical os
  • grade IV: complete previapraevia: placenta completely covers the internal cervical os

Sometimes types I and II are termed a "minor" or "partial" placenta previapraevia, and types III and IV are termed a "major" placenta previapraevia 5.

Risk factors

Placenta previapraevia is associated with a number of risk factors, including: 

  • previous placenta previapraevia
  • previous caesareanCaesarean section
  • increased maternal age
  • increased parity
  • large placentas:
  • maternal history of smoking
Associations

Radiographic features

Ultrasound

Due to placental trophotropism, the diagnosis of a placenta previapraevia is not usually made before 20 weeks.

During the 'routine' 18 week morphology scan, the distance between lower edge of the placenta and the internal os should be measured. If it lies within a few centimeters of the os, then a repeat ultrasound at ~32 weeks should be performed to ensure that the edge has migrated further away. 

MRI

MRI is the gold standard to imaging the placenta and its relationship to the cervix, although in most instances it is not required. Sagittal images best demonstrate the relationship of the placenta to the internal cervical os.

Treatment and prognosis

A low-lying placenta is relatively common at the mid-trimester morphology scan. As the fetus grows and the uterus expands, the lower uterine segment thins and grows disproportionately, such that in most cases the placenta is no longer low-lying by a follow-up study (usually performed at 32-34 weeks).  

In the case of a complete placenta previapraevia, a caesarianCaesarian section is required for delivery to avoid the risk of fetal and maternal haemorrhage.

Differential diagnosis

These can make the placenta appear closer to the internal cervical os than it actually is (particularly on a 2nd trimester scan). Postvoid images should always be obtained if previapraevia is suspected.

Occasionally, a subchorionic haematoma that extends over the cervix can mimic placenta previapraevia, especially if the haemorrhage is still echogenic. Follow up imaging would be useful to distinguish the two entities.

  • -<p><strong>Placenta previa</strong> is a term given to an abnormally low position of the placenta such that it lies close to, or covers the internal cervical os. </p><p>It is a potentially life-threatening condition to both mother and infant, which may result in exsanguination. As such, antenatal diagnosis is essential to adequately prepare for childbirth.  </p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The term "placenta previa" covers to a spectrum of anomalies and results from partial or total insertion of the placenta into the lower uterine segment.</p><h5>Classification</h5><p>Previa is divided into 4 grades depending on the relationship and distance to the internal cervical os:</p><ul>
  • +<p><strong>Placenta praevia</strong> is a term given to an abnormally low position of the placenta such that it lies close to, or covers the internal cervical os. </p><p>It is a potentially life-threatening condition to both mother and infant, which may result in exsanguination. As such, antenatal diagnosis is essential to adequately prepare for childbirth.  </p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The term "placenta praevia" covers to a spectrum of anomalies and results from partial or total insertion of the placenta into the lower uterine segment.</p><h5>Classification</h5><p>Praevia is divided into 4 grades depending on the relationship and distance to the internal cervical os:</p><ul>
  • -<strong>grade II: </strong><a href="/articles/marginal-previa">marginal previa</a>: placental tissue reaches the margin of the internal cervical os, but does not cover it</li>
  • +<strong>grade II: </strong><a href="/articles/marginal-previa">marginal praevia</a>: placental tissue reaches the margin of the internal cervical os, but does not cover it</li>
  • -<strong>grade III: </strong><a href="/articles/partial-previa">partial previa</a>: placenta partially covers the internal cervical os</li>
  • +<strong>grade III: </strong><a href="/articles/partial-previa">partial praevia</a>: placenta partially covers the internal cervical os</li>
  • -<strong>grade IV: </strong><a href="/articles/complete-previa">complete previa:</a> placenta completely covers the internal cervical os</li>
  • -</ul><p>Sometimes types I and II are termed a "minor" or "partial" placenta previa, and types III and IV are termed a "major" placenta previa <sup>5</sup>.</p><h5>Risk factors</h5><p>Placenta previa is associated with a number of risk factors, including: </p><ul>
  • -<li>previous placenta previa</li>
  • -<li>previous caesarean section</li>
  • +<strong>grade IV: </strong><a href="/articles/complete-previa">complete praevia:</a> placenta completely covers the internal cervical os</li>
  • +</ul><p>Sometimes types I and II are termed a "minor" or "partial" placenta praevia, and types III and IV are termed a "major" placenta praevia <sup>5</sup>.</p><h5>Risk factors</h5><p>Placenta praevia is associated with a number of risk factors, including: </p><ul>
  • +<li>previous placenta praevia</li>
  • +<li>previous Caesarean section</li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/multifetal-pregnancy-1">multiple gestations</a></li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/twin-pregnancy-1">multiple gestations</a></li>
  • -</li></ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>Due to <a href="/articles/placental-trophotropism">placental trophotropism</a>, the diagnosis of a placenta previa is not usually made before 20 weeks.</p><p>During the 'routine' 18 week morphology scan, the distance between lower edge of the placenta and the internal os should be measured. If it lies within a few centimeters of the os, then a repeat ultrasound at ~32 weeks should be performed to ensure that the edge has migrated further away. </p><h5>MRI</h5><p>MRI is the gold standard to imaging the placenta and its relationship to the cervix, although in most instances it is not required. Sagittal images best demonstrate the relationship of the placenta to the internal cervical os.</p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>A <a href="/articles/low-lying-placenta">low-lying placenta</a> is relatively common at the mid-trimester morphology scan. As the fetus grows and the uterus expands, the lower uterine segment thins and grows disproportionately, such that in most cases the placenta is no longer low-lying by a follow-up study (usually performed at 32-34 weeks).  </p><p>In the case of a <a href="/articles/complete-placenta-previa">complete placenta previa</a>, a caesarian section is required for delivery to avoid the risk of fetal and maternal haemorrhage.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><ul>
  • +</li></ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>Due to <a href="/articles/placental-trophotropism">placental trophotropism</a>, the diagnosis of a placenta praevia is not usually made before 20 weeks.</p><p>During the 'routine' 18 week morphology scan, the distance between lower edge of the placenta and the internal os should be measured. If it lies within a few centimeters of the os, then a repeat ultrasound at ~32 weeks should be performed to ensure that the edge has migrated further away. </p><h5>MRI</h5><p>MRI is the gold standard to imaging the placenta and its relationship to the cervix, although in most instances it is not required. Sagittal images best demonstrate the relationship of the placenta to the internal cervical os.</p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>A <a href="/articles/low-lying-placenta">low-lying placenta</a> is relatively common at the mid-trimester morphology scan. As the fetus grows and the uterus expands, the lower uterine segment thins and grows disproportionately, such that in most cases the placenta is no longer low-lying by a follow-up study (usually performed at 32-34 weeks).  </p><p>In the case of a <a href="/articles/complete-placenta-previa">complete placenta praevia</a>, a Caesarian section is required for delivery to avoid the risk of fetal and maternal haemorrhage.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><ul>
  • -</ul><p>These can make the placenta appear closer to the internal cervical os than it actually is (particularly on a 2<sup>nd </sup>trimester scan). Postvoid images should always be obtained if previa is suspected.</p><p>Occasionally, a <a title="Subchorionic haematoma" href="/articles/subchorionic-haemorrhage-2">subchorionic haematoma</a> that extends over the cervix can mimic placenta previa, especially if the haemorrhage is still echogenic. Follow up imaging would be useful to distinguish the two entities.</p>
  • +</ul><p>These can make the placenta appear closer to the internal cervical os than it actually is (particularly on a 2<sup>nd </sup>trimester scan). Postvoid images should always be obtained if praevia is suspected.</p><p>Occasionally, a <a href="/articles/subchorionic-haemorrhage-2">subchorionic haematoma</a> that extends over the cervix can mimic placenta praevia, especially if the haemorrhage is still echogenic. Follow up imaging would be useful to distinguish the two entities.</p>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.