Aggressive fibromatosis
Updates to Article Attributes
Aggressive fibromatosis is a type of musculoskeletal fibromatosis. While it is a non-metastasising fibrous lesion, it is thought to be a true neoplasm that that arises from the fascial and musculo-aponeuroticmusculoaponeurotic coverings, sometimes at the site of a traumatic or post-surgical scar.
Terminology
The term aggressive fibromatosis is occasionally used synonymously with desmoid tumours by some authors 5. This article will focus in the musculoskeletal presentation of this tumour, for the abdominal presentation, please refer to the latter.
Epidemiology
According to one the study, the mean age at presentation is ~40 years of age 7. According to the same study there There may be slight female predilection (male to female ratio of 1:1.2).
Pathology
Being non-encapsulated, poorly circumscribed, and infiltrative, aggressive fibromatosis fibromatosis grows insidiously and invades locally. The lesions may may become quite large and adhere to neighbouring structures, such as neurovascular bundles. The lesions grossly resemble scar tissue and are composed of well-differentiated fibroblasts fibroblasts embedded in an abundant collagenous matrix with increased increased cellularity at the periphery. Cytologic features of malignancy are lacking. Its exact cause is unknown.
Associations
Recognised associations include:
- surgical or accidental trauma
- pregnancy
- oestrogenic hormone use
- Gardner syndrome
- familial adenomatous polyposis
Radiographic features
Plain filmradiograph
Radiographs may show a soft-tissue mass, localised periosteal thickening, or frankdirect bony destruction/invasion4.
MRI
Signal charactersiticscharacteristics of the lesion include 7:
- T1: homogeneous iso-intensity or mild hyperintensity
-
T2/STIR: high heterogenous
highsignal - T1 C+ (Gd): typically enhances avidly
-
GE: peripheral areas of smooth
low/lowlow signal intensity that do not represent calcification (check radiographs) or haemorrhage (check gradient images/scouts for blooming) are characteristic
Angiography
May show arterial stretching, neovascularity, and tumour staining 4.
Treatment and prognosis
It does not not have any propensity for metastasis although can aggressively invade structures. The optimal management for aggressive fibromatosis depends on tumortumour location and extent. Surgical resection may be offered although the likelihood likelihood of local recurrence after surgery is high, particularly if margins are positive. Moderate-dose radiotherapy alone for gross disease or after a microscopically incomplete resection yields local control rates of approximately 75-80% 3. Treatment with pharmacologic agents results in objective response rates of approximately 40-50%.
See also
-<p><strong>Aggressive fibromatosis</strong> is a type of <a href="/articles/musculoskeletal-fibromatoses">musculoskeletal fibromatosis</a>. While it is a non-metastasising fibrous lesion, it is thought to be a true neoplasm that arises from fascial and musculo-aponeurotic coverings, sometimes at the site of a traumatic or post-surgical scar.</p><h4>Terminology</h4><p>The term aggressive fibromatosis is occasionally used synonymously with <a href="/articles/desmoid-tumour">desmoid tumours</a> by some authors <sup>5</sup>.</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>According one the study, the mean age at presentation is ~40 years of age <sup>7</sup>. According to the same study there may be slight female predilection (male to female ratio of 1:1.2).</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>Being non-encapsulated, poorly circumscribed, and infiltrative, aggressive fibromatosis grows insidiously and invades locally. The lesions may become quite large and adhere to neighbouring structures, such as neurovascular bundles. The lesions grossly resemble scar tissue and are composed of well-differentiated fibroblasts embedded in an abundant collagenous matrix with increased cellularity at the periphery. Cytologic features of malignancy are lacking. Its exact cause is unknown.</p><h5>Associations</h5><p>Recognised associations include:</p><ul>- +<p><strong>Aggressive fibromatosis</strong> is a type of <a href="/articles/musculoskeletal-fibromatoses">musculoskeletal fibromatosis</a>. While it is a non-metastasising fibrous lesion, it is thought to be a true neoplasm that arises from the fascial and musculoaponeurotic coverings, sometimes at the site of a traumatic or post-surgical scar.</p><h4>Terminology</h4><p>The term aggressive fibromatosis is occasionally used synonymously with <a href="/articles/desmoid-tumour">desmoid tumours</a> by some authors <sup>5</sup>. This article will focus in the musculoskeletal presentation of this tumour, for the abdominal presentation, please refer to the latter.</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>According to one the study, the mean age at presentation is ~40 years of age <sup>7</sup>. There may be slight female predilection (male to female ratio of 1:1.2).</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>Being non-encapsulated, poorly circumscribed, and infiltrative, aggressive fibromatosis grows insidiously and invades locally. The lesions may become quite large and adhere to neighbouring structures, such as neurovascular bundles. The lesions grossly resemble scar tissue and are composed of well-differentiated fibroblasts embedded in an abundant collagenous matrix with increased cellularity at the periphery. Cytologic features of malignancy are lacking. Its exact cause is unknown.</p><h5>Associations</h5><p>Recognised associations include:</p><ul>
-</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Plain film</h5><p>Radiographs may show a soft-tissue mass, localised periosteal thickening, or frank bony destruction/invasion <sup>4</sup>.</p><h5>MRI</h5><p>Signal charactersitics of the lesion include <sup>7</sup>:</p><ul>- +</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Plain radiograph</h5><p>Radiographs may show a soft-tissue mass, localised periosteal thickening, or direct bony destruction/invasion <sup>4</sup>.</p><h5>MRI</h5><p>Signal characteristics of the lesion include <sup>7</sup>:</p><ul>
-<strong>T2/STIR:</strong> heterogenous high signal</li>- +<strong>T2/STIR:</strong> high heterogenous signal</li>
-<strong>GE: </strong>peripheral areas of smooth low/low signal intensity that do not represent calcification (check radiographs) or haemorrhage (check gradient images/scouts for blooming) are characteristic</li>-</ul><h5>Angiography</h5><p>May show arterial stretching, neovascularity, and tumour staining <sup>4</sup>.</p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>It does not have any propensity for metastasis although can aggressively invade structures. The optimal management for aggressive fibromatosis depends on tumor location and extent. Surgical resection may be offered although the likelihood of local recurrence after surgery is high, particularly if margins are positive. Moderate-dose radiotherapy alone for gross disease or after a microscopically incomplete resection yields local control rates of approximately 75-80% <sup>3</sup>. Treatment with pharmacologic agents results in objective response rates of approximately 40-50%.</p><h4>See also</h4><ul><li><a href="/articles/soft-tissue-tumours-classification-who-2002">WHO 2002 classification of soft tissue tumours</a></li></ul>- +<strong>GE: </strong>peripheral areas of smooth low signal intensity that do not represent calcification (check radiographs) or haemorrhage (check gradient images/scouts for blooming) are characteristic</li>
- +</ul><h5>Angiography</h5><p>May show arterial stretching, neovascularity, and tumour staining <sup>4</sup>.</p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>It does not have any propensity for metastasis although can aggressively invade structures. The optimal management for aggressive fibromatosis depends on tumour location and extent. Surgical resection may be offered although the likelihood of local recurrence after surgery is high, particularly if margins are positive. Moderate-dose radiotherapy alone for gross disease or after a microscopically incomplete resection yields local control rates of approximately 75-80% <sup>3</sup>. Treatment with pharmacologic agents results in objective response rates of approximately 40-50%.</p><h4>See also</h4><ul><li><a href="/articles/soft-tissue-tumours-classification-who-2002">WHO 2002 classification of soft tissue tumours</a></li></ul>