Collateral vessels in acute stroke

Changed by Craig Hacking, 9 Oct 2019

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

During the acute imaging of ischaemic stroke, the presence or absence of collateral vessels is an important consideration when deciding if the patient wouldwill benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (ECR, endovascular clot retrieval) 1.

Studies have shown that in acute stroke, both CTA and MRA can assessare accurate modalities in assessing the status of collateral vessels 2-4. The status of these vessels not surprisingly has an impact oninfluences the evolution of the ischaemic penumbra, the size of the core infarct and affects functional outcomes. The presence of good collateral vessels promoteshas been shown to promote recanalization after acute large vessels occlusion and reduces the risk of hemorrhagic transformation by limiting local perfusion impairment 5, 7, 8. The paucity of good collateral vessels also correlates with a higher risk of treatment complications 7.

Overall, the poorer the collateral vessels in a region of ischaemia, the larger the core infarct (DWI lesion size 5) and the worse the clinical (functional) outcomes 3-5. Good leptomeningeal collateral vessels have been shown to correlate with lower baseline ASPECTS 3 and robust collateral vessels have been shown to be an independent predictor of final infarct volume 4

Patients with poor collateral vessels have been termed fast progressors in whom infarct growth rate is quick compared to patients with strong collaterals (, the slow progressors) who canare able to tolerate ischaemia longer without progressing to infarction 1.

Collateral scoring systems

Several scoring systems have been described in the literature 1, based either on a single- or multiphase CT angiogram:

  • -<p>During the acute imaging of <a href="/articles/ischaemic-stroke">ischaemic stroke</a>, the presence or absence of <strong>collateral vessels</strong> is an important consideration when deciding if the patient would benefit from <a href="/articles/mechanical-thrombectomy-for-acute-ischaemic-stroke">endovascular thrombectomy</a> (ECR, endovascular clot retrieval) <sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Studies have shown that in acute stroke, CTA and MRA can assess the status of collateral vessels <sup>2-4</sup>. The status of these vessels not surprisingly has an impact on the ischaemic penumbra, size of the core infarct and functional outcomes. The presence of good collateral vessels promotes recanalization after acute large vessels occlusion and reduces the risk of hemorrhagic transformation by limiting local perfusion impairment <sup>5, 7, 8</sup>. The paucity of good collateral vessels also correlates with a higher risk of treatment complications <sup>7</sup>.</p><p>Overall, the poorer the collateral vessels in a region of ischaemia, the larger the core infarct (DWI lesion size <sup>5</sup>) and the worse the clinical (functional) outcomes <sup>3-5</sup>. Good leptomeningeal collateral vessels have been shown to correlate with lower baseline <a href="/articles/alberta-stroke-program-early-ct-score-aspects-1">ASPECTS</a> <sup>3 </sup>and robust collateral vessels have been shown to be an independent predictor of final infarct volume <sup>4</sup>. </p><p>Patients with poor collateral vessels have been termed <strong>fast progressors</strong> in whom infarct growth rate is quick compared to patients with strong collaterals (<strong>slow progressors</strong>) who can tolerate ischaemia longer without progressing to infarction <sup>1</sup>.</p><h4>Collateral scoring systems</h4><p>Several scoring systems have been described in the literature <sup>1</sup>, based either on a single- or multiphase CT angiogram:</p><ul>
  • +<p>During the acute imaging of <a href="/articles/ischaemic-stroke">ischaemic stroke</a>, the presence or absence of <strong>collateral vessels</strong> is an important consideration when deciding if the patient will benefit from <a href="/articles/mechanical-thrombectomy-for-acute-ischaemic-stroke">endovascular thrombectomy</a> (ECR, endovascular clot retrieval) <sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Studies have shown that in acute stroke, both CTA and MRA are accurate modalities in assessing the status of collateral vessels <sup>2-4</sup>. The status of these vessels not surprisingly influences the evolution of the ischaemic penumbra, the size of the core infarct and affects functional outcomes. The presence of good collateral vessels has been shown to promote recanalization after acute large vessels occlusion and reduces the risk of hemorrhagic transformation by limiting local perfusion impairment <sup>5, 7, 8</sup>. The paucity of good collateral vessels also correlates with a higher risk of treatment complications <sup>7</sup>.</p><p>Overall, the poorer the collateral vessels in a region of ischaemia, the larger the core infarct (DWI lesion size <sup>5</sup>) and the worse the clinical (functional) outcomes <sup>3-5</sup>. Good leptomeningeal collateral vessels have been shown to correlate with lower baseline <a href="/articles/alberta-stroke-program-early-ct-score-aspects-1">ASPECTS</a> <sup>3 </sup>and robust collateral vessels have been shown to be an independent predictor of final infarct volume <sup>4</sup>. </p><p>Patients with poor collateral vessels have been termed <strong>fast progressors</strong> in whom infarct growth rate is quick compared to patients with strong collaterals, the <strong>slow progressors </strong>who are able to tolerate ischaemia longer without progressing to infarction <sup>1</sup>.</p><h4>Collateral scoring systems</h4><p>Several scoring systems have been described in the literature <sup>1</sup>, based either on single- or multiphase CT angiogram:</p><ul>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.