CT neck (protocol)

Changed by Joachim Feger, 9 Sep 2021

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

The CT neck protocol serves as a radiological examination of the head and neck. This protocol is usually performed as a contrast study and might be acquired separately or combined with a CT chest or CT chest-abdomen-pelvis. On rare occasions, it will be performed as a non-contrast study. Depending on the clinical question it might be acquired as double acquisition with a CT angiogram or as a single acquisition e.g with a mono- or biphasic technique.

Note: This article aims to frame a general concept of a CT protocol for the assessment of the head and neck. Protocol specifics will vary depending on CT scanner type, specific hardware and software, radiologist and perhaps referrer preference, patient factors e.g. implants, specific indications.

Contrast doses apply for CT examinations in adults.

A typical CT of the neck might look like as follows:

Indications

Typical indications include the following 1-5:

Purpose

In the setting of inflammatory or neoplastic processes, the purpose of a CT neck is the localisation and characterisation of the respective process its extent and its relation to the adjacent tissues as well as the detection of potential complications.

The search for a foreign body requires its localisation. Because contrast material may pose a confounding factor the examination should be performed as a non-contrast study 1.

In the setting of head and neck trauma, the evaluation includes the detection and characterisation of maxillofacial fractures, laryngotracheal injuries, and fractures to the skull base and cervical spine 2,3.

In the setting of thyroid disease, a CT of the neck is usually performed as a non-contrast study and should demonstrate the retrosternal or full extent of the thyroid gland.

Technique

  • patient position
    • supine position 
    • both arms next to the body, shoulders pulled down
  • tube voltage
    • ≤120 kVp
  • tube current
    • as suggested by the automated current adjustment mode 
  • scout
    • mid-chest to vertex
  • scan extent
    • frontal sinus to the aortic arch
    • depending on the clinical question might exclude the orbit to save radiation on the eye lens
  • scan direction
    • craniocaudal
  • scan geometry
    • field of view (FOV): 140-200 mm (should be adjusted to increase in-plane resolution)
    • slice thickness: ≤0.75 mm, interval: ≤0.5 mm
    • reconstruction kernel: soft tissue kernel (e.g. I40), high-resolution kernel (e.g. I70)
  • contrast injection considerations
  • non-contrast (e.g. foreign body, thyroid disease)
  • contrast volume:  70-100 mL
  • biphasic injection technique (inflammatory conditions)
    • 50-60 ml contrast media at 1-2 mL/s
    • 40-50 ml contrast media followed by 30-50 ml saline chaser at 2-3 mL/s starting after 60 seconds
    • scan delay: 80-100 seconds
  • monophasic injection technique (parotid tumours)
    • 70-100ml followed by 30-50 ml saline chaser at 2-3 mL/s
    • scan delay: 40-50 seconds
  • respiration phase
    • single breath-hold: inspiration
  • multiplanar reconstructions
    • sagittal images: sagittal aligned through the centre of the vertebral bodies and the chin
    • coronal images: coronal aligned to the transverse processes and the mandibula
    • axial images:perpendicular to the head-neck axis
    • slice thickness: soft tissue ≤3 mm, overlap >30%, bone ≤2 mm

Practical points

  • patient positioning before scanning might reduce and facilitate multiplanar reconstructions
  • reconstructions in both standard kernel and high-resolution kernels
  • in the setting of trauma separate reconstructions of the cervical spine should be obtained from the raw data set
  • place markers in the setting of palpable lumps and bumps
  • depending on the exact indication the scan might require an extension of the scan field
  • dose optimisation
    • use iterative reconstruction algorithms if available
    • try to minimize acquisitions (e.g with a biphasic injection protocol)
  • imaging in the setting of implants
  • -<li>head and neck neoplasms</li>
  • +<li><a title="WHO classification of head and neck tumors" href="/articles/who-classification-of-head-and-neck-tumors">head and neck neoplasms</a></li>

References changed:

  • 1. Cunqueiro A, Gomes W, Lee P, Dym R, Scheinfeld M. CT of the Neck: Image Analysis and Reporting in the Emergency Setting. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1760-81. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190012">doi:10.1148/rg.2019190012</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589582">Pubmed</a>
  • 2. Shi J, Uyeda J, Duran-Mendicuti A, Potter C, Nunez D. Multidetector CT of Laryngeal Injuries: Principles of Injury Recognition. Radiographics. 2019;39(3):879-92. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180076">doi:10.1148/rg.2019180076</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30978150">Pubmed</a>
  • 3. Go J, Acharya J, Branchcomb J, Rajamohan A. Traumatic Neck and Skull Base Injuries. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1796-807. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190177">doi:10.1148/rg.2019190177</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589581">Pubmed</a>
  • 4. Dammann F, Bootz F, Cohnen M, Haßfeld S, Tatagiba M, Kösling S. Diagnostic Imaging Modalities in Head and Neck Disease. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2014;111(23-24):417-23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0417">doi:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0417</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24980674">Pubmed</a>
  • 5. Kim T & Lee Y. Contrast-Enhanced Multi-Detector CT Examination of Parotid Gland Tumors: Determination of the Most Helpful Scanning Delay for Predicting Histologic Subtypes. Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology. 2019;103(1):2. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1596">doi:10.5334/jbsr.1596</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623171">Pubmed</a>
  • 6. Tipnis S, Rieter W, Patel D, Stalcup S, Matheus M, Spampinato M. Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Neck CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(6):1067-73. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a6073">doi:10.3174/ajnr.a6073</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122913">Pubmed</a>
  • 7. Jahnke P, Conzelmann J, Genske U et al. Task-Based Assessment of Neck CT Protocols Using Patient-Mimicking Phantoms—effects of Protocol Parameters on Dose and Diagnostic Performance. Eur Radiol. 2020;31(5):3177-86. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8">doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151393">Pubmed</a>
  • 8. Roele E, Timmer V, Vaassen L, van Kroonenburgh A, Postma A. Dual-Energy CT in Head and Neck Imaging. Curr Radiol Rep. 2017;5(5):19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-017-0213-0">doi:10.1007/s40134-017-0213-0</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435761">Pubmed</a>
  • 1. Cunqueiro A, Gomes WA, Lee P, Dym RJ, Scheinfeld MH. CT of the Neck: Image Analysis and Reporting in the Emergency Setting. (2019) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 39 (6): 1760-1781. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190012">doi:10.1148/rg.2019190012</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589582">Pubmed</a> <span class=“ref_v4"></span>
  • 2. Shi J, Uyeda JW, Duran-Mendicuti A, Potter CA, Nunez DB. Multidetector CT of Laryngeal Injuries: Principles of Injury Recognition. (2019) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 39 (3): 879-892. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180076">doi:10.1148/rg.2019180076</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30978150">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 3. Go JL, Acharya J, Branchcomb JC, Rajamohan AG. Traumatic Neck and Skull Base Injuries. (2019) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 39 (6): 1796-1807. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190177">doi:10.1148/rg.2019190177</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589581">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 4. Dammann F, Bootz F, Cohnen M, Hassfeld S, Tatagiba M, Kösling S. Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease. (2014) Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 111 (23-24): 417-23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0417">doi:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0417</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24980674">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 5. Kim TY, Lee Y. Contrast-enhanced Multi-detector CT Examination of Parotid Gland Tumors: Determination of the Most Helpful Scanning Delay for Predicting Histologic Subtypes. (2019) Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology. 103 (1): 2. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1596">doi:10.5334/jbsr.1596</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623171">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 6. Tipnis SV, Rieter WJ, Patel D, Stalcup ST, Matheus MG, Spampinato MV. Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Neck CT. (2019) AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 40 (6): 1067-1073. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6073">doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6073</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122913">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 7. Jahnke P, Conzelmann J, Genske U, Nunninger M, Scheel M, Hamm B, Diekhoff T. Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms-effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance. (2021) European radiology. 31 (5): 3177-3186. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8">doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151393">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 8. Roele ED, Timmer VCML, Vaassen LAA, van Kroonenburgh AMJL, Postma AA. Dual-Energy CT in Head and Neck Imaging. (2017) Current radiology reports. 5 (5): 19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-017-0213-0">doi:10.1007/s40134-017-0213-0</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435761">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.