Paranasal sinus fractures

Changed by Louie Ye, 29 Nov 2017

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Paranasal sinuses are air-filled cavities surrounding the nasal cavity proper which includes maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus, frontal sinus and ethmoid sinus. Trauma to the superior and middle thirds of the face can often lead to in paranasal sinus fractures are - type involving one of fracturemore paranasal sinuses. Furthermore, mechanism of fracture most common presentation traumatic forces greater than paranasal sinus resistance may result in brain injury 1.

Epidemiology

Aetiology and demographics willfor facial trauma causing paranasal fractures vary significantly depending on the population demographics and with where patients presentgeographically. In developed countries, assaults and motor vehicle accidents are the setting of amain reasons for facial trauma centre. By contrast, in New Zealanddeveloping countries, 90% of patients are malework related accidents age, with 64% between the ages of 15 and 29 2:gender

  • assault: 50%
  • motor vehicle accident (MVA): 1045%
  • assault: 22.5%
  • fall: 1517.9%
  • sport: 157.8%
  • otherwork related: 104.5%
  • others: 2.3%

Clinical presentation

Presenting complaints will include 3:

Pathology

Location
  • angle: 20-33% 1-3
  • body: 15-25%
  • condyle or neck: 15-36%  (see: TMJ trauma)
  • parasymphyseal: 14-15%
  • ramus: 5%
  • coronoid process: 1-3%
  • alveolar ridge: 2%

Unifocal fractures are common, accounting for approximately 40% of all mandibular fractures 1:

  • multifocal: 60% 1
  • unifocal: 40%
    • simple: 25%
    • comminuted: 10%
    • associated with condylar subluxation: 5%
Subtypes

Treatment and prognosis

Treatment can be conservative or involve formal reduction (which may be open or closed). Closed reduction may be supported with intermaxillary fixation or splints (ORIF).

Complications
  • -<p><strong>Paranasal sinus fractures</strong> are - type of fracture, mechanism of fracture most common presentation .</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>Aetiology and demographics will vary significantly depending on the population demographics and with where patients present. In the setting of a trauma centre in New Zealand, 90% of patients are male, with 64% between the ages of 15 and 29 <sup>2</sup>:</p><ul>
  • -<li>assault: 50%</li>
  • -<li>motor vehicle accident (MVA): 10%</li>
  • -<li>fall: 15%</li>
  • -<li>sport: 15%</li>
  • -<li>other: 10%</li>
  • +<p><strong>Paranasal sinuses </strong>are air-filled cavities surrounding the nasal cavity proper which includes <a href="/articles/maxillary-sinus">maxillary sinus</a>, <a href="/articles/sphenoid-sinus">sphenoid sinus</a>, <a href="/articles/frontal-sinus">frontal sinus</a> and <a href="/articles/ethmoidal-air-cells">ethmoid sinus</a>. Trauma to the superior and middle thirds of the face can often lead to in paranasal sinus fractures involving one of more paranasal sinuses. Furthermore, traumatic forces greater than paranasal sinus resistance may result in brain injury <sup>1</sup>. </p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>Aetiology for facial trauma causing paranasal fractures vary geographically. In developed countries, assaults and motor vehicle accidents are the main reasons for facial trauma. By contrast, in developing countries, work related accidents age, gender</p><ul>
  • +<li>motor vehicle accident (MVA): 45%</li>
  • +<li>assault: 22.5%</li>
  • +<li>fall: 17.9%</li>
  • +<li>sport: 7.8%</li>
  • +<li>work related: 4.5%</li>
  • +<li>others: 2.3%</li>
  • -<li>chin paresthesia (damage to the <a href="/articles/mental-nerve">mental nerve</a>, a terminal branch of the <a href="/articles/inferior-alveolar-nerve">inferior alveolar nerve</a>)</li>
  • -<li>malocclusion</li>
  • -<li>trismus</li>
  • -<li>dental damage</li>
  • -<li>abnormal mobility</li>
  • -<li>laceration of the skin of the <a href="/articles/external-auditory-canal">external acoustic meatus</a>
  • -</li>
  • +<li> </li>
  • -<li>angle: 20-33% <sup>1-3</sup>
  • -</li>
  • -<li>body: 15-25%</li>
  • -<li>condyle or neck: 15-36%  (see: <a href="/articles/tmj-trauma">TMJ trauma</a>)</li>
  • -<li>parasymphyseal: 14-15%</li>
  • -<li>ramus: 5%</li>
  • -<li>coronoid process: 1-3%</li>
  • -<li>alveolar ridge: 2%</li>
  • -</ul><p>Unifocal fractures are common, accounting for approximately 40% of all mandibular fractures <sup>1</sup>:</p><ul>
  • -<li>multifocal: 60% <sup>1</sup>
  • -</li>
  • -<li>unifocal: 40%<ul>
  • -<li>simple: 25%</li>
  • -<li>comminuted: 10%</li>
  • -<li>associated with condylar subluxation: 5%</li>
  • -</ul>
  • -</li>
  • -</ul><h5>Subtypes</h5><ul><li><a href="/articles/guardsman-fracture">guardsman fracture</a></li></ul><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>Treatment can be conservative or involve formal reduction (which may be open or closed). <a href="/articles/closed-reduction">Closed reduction</a> may be supported with intermaxillary fixation or splints (<a href="/articles/open-reduction-internal-fixation">ORIF</a>).</p><h5>Complications</h5><ul>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/osteomyelitis">osteomyelitis</a></li>
  • -<li>permanent malocclusion <sup>3</sup>
  • -</li>
  • -<li>permanent paresthesia</li>
  • -</ul>
  • +<li> </li>
  • +<li> </li>
  • +</ul><p> </p><h5>Subtypes</h5><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>Treatment can be conservative or involve formal reduction (which may be open or closed). <a href="/articles/closed-reduction">Closed reduction</a> </p><h5>Complications</h5><ul><li> </li></ul>

References changed:

  • 1. Kazanjian HV, Converse’s JM. Surgical treatment of facial injuries, vol. 1. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1959. p. 231–337 (It. Ed).

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.