Pineoblastomas are tumours that are best thought of small round blue cell tumours located in the pineal region and thus, they closely resemble (both on imaging and on histology) medulloblastomas and retinoblastomas. They are the most aggressive and highest grade tumour among pineal parenchymal tumours, and considered WHO grade IV tumours.
On imaging, they usually present as large lobulated and enhancing tumours (more than 3 cm), hyperattenuating on CT (highly cellular), with heterogeneous signal intensities on MRI, sometimes with evident necrotic and haemorrhage regions. Restricted diffusion is commonly evident and, in almost all cases, obstructive hydrocephalus is observed at the presentation.
Pineoblastomas are the most aggressive pineal parenchymal tumour and account for a substantial proportion of such tumours (24-50%) 7. They are typically found in young children, with only a slight female predilection (M:F 0.7:1; similar to other pineal parenchymal tumours), which is in contrast to the male predominance seen in pineal germinomas) 12.
There is a well-established association with hereditary retinoblastomas. Patients with hereditary (bilateral) retinoblastoma no more than 5% develop midline (suprasellar or pineal) neuroblastic tumours 6,10. Such cases are sometimes referred to as trilateral retinoblastoma.
Pineoblastomas are typically large and almost always associated with obstructive hydrocephalus, due to compression of the cerebral aqueduct. Compression of the tectal plate may also result in the Parinaud syndrome.
They are highly malignant tumours prone to CSF seeding, which is present in 15% of patients at the time of diagnosis.
Pineoblastomas originate from pinealocytes and/or their precursors 11. They are the least differentiated pineal cell tumours, with pineocytomas and pineal parenchymal tumour with intermediate differentiation representing better-differentiated tumours along the same spectrum. Pineoblastomas are considered WHO grade IV tumours 12.
These tumours are poorly defined, often invading adjacent brain parenchyma. Their cut surface is pink and soft, with areas of necrosis and haemorrhage not infrequently seen 12.
Pineoblastomas are composed of tightly packed small round blue cells (high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio) which in turn determines their imaging appearances (see below) 7. The growth pattern is largely featureless with the pineocytomatous rossettes seen in pineocytomas not present 12. In contrast, Homer Wright rosettes and Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes are occasionally seen 12.
Areas of necrosis are frequently encountered 12. Mitotic rate is usually high.
Immunophenotype is similar to other pineal parenchymal tumours 12.
- synaptophysin: positive
- SMARCB1: positive
- other neuronal markers (e.g. neuron-specific enolase, NFP and chromogranin-A): variable
Pineoblastomas tend to be large poorly defined masses, with frequent CSF seeding at presentation. They have a tendency to involve directly adjacent brain structures, which helps distinguish them from other pineal tumours that tend to be better circumscribed.
The solid component tends to be slightly hyperdense compared to the adjacent brain due to high cellularity. This is a characteristic shared by other small round blue cell tumours such as PNET and medulloblastoma.
Classically, they are described as having peripherally dispersed or "exploded" calcification (mnemonic: blasted calcification), similar to pineocytomas. In contrast, pineal germinomas tend to engulf pineal calcification.
Pineoblastomas tend to appear as sizable (>4 cm) irregular masses often with evidence of invasion into adjacent brain 6,9. Typical signal characteristics include 9:
- T1: isointense to hypointense to adjacent brain
- isointense to adjacent brain
- areas of cyst formation or necrosis may be present
- T1 C+ (Gd): vivid heterogeneous enhancement
- restricted diffusion due to dense cellular packing
- ADC values are typically ~400-800 mm2/s 7
Central necrosis is sometimes present which can make the mass appear centrally cystic and thus can roughly mimic a pineal cyst, although the latter should have a smooth, thin wall 6.
Screening of the whole neural axis is necessary as CSF seeding is seen in 45% of cases 7.
Treatment and prognosis
Treatment is usually a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation 7. Despite treatment, the prognosis has historically been poor, with a 5-year survival as low as 10%. More recently 5-year survival of 58-81% have been reported 8,12 with median overall survival times of 4-8 years 12. .
The most important factors predicting a favourable outcome are early detection and treatment with at least chemotherapy, preferably a high dose regime with stem cell rescue 11.
General imaging differential considerations include:
- other pineal parenchymal tumours
- pineocytoma: mature well-differentiated tumour: smaller and better circumscribed
- pineal parenchymal tumour with intermediate differentiation
- papillary tumour of the pineal region
- germ cell tumours
- thin (<2 mm) wall
- astrocytoma of the pineal gland
- imaging is very similar
- located in the vermis rather than pineal region but can be difficult to distinguish if very high in the vermis and very large
Pineal region masses
The pineal region is anatomically complex and plays host to a number of unique masses and tumours as well as potentially affected by many entities seen more frequently elsewhere in the brain.
- cystic non-neoplastic lesions
- pineal parenchymal tumours
- germ cell tumours
- tumours also encountered in the pineal region
- pineal gland metastases
- vascular lesions
- 1. Smirniotopoulos JG, Rushing EJ, Mena H. Pineal region masses: differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 1992;12 (3): 577-96. Radiographics (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 2. Chang T, Teng MM, Guo WY et-al. CT of pineal tumors and intracranial germ-cell tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153 (6): 1269-74. AJR Am J Roentgenol (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 3. Ganti SR, Hilal SK, Stein BM et-al. CT of pineal region tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1.86;146 (3): 451-8. AJR Am J Roentgenol (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 4. Tien RD, Barkovich AJ, Edwards MS. MR imaging of pineal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155 (1): 143-51. AJR Am J Roentgenol (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 5. Banks KP, Brown SJ. AJR teaching file: solid masses of the pineal region. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186 (3): S233-5. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0519 - Pubmed citation
- 6. Rodjan F, De Graaf P, Moll AC et-al. Brain abnormalities on MR imaging in patients with retinoblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31 (8): 1385-9. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (full text) - doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2102 - Pubmed citation
- 7. Dumrongpisutikul N, Intrapiromkul J, Yousem DM. Distinguishing between germinomas and pineal cell tumors on MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33 (3): 550-5. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (full text) - doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2806 - Pubmed citation
- 8. Zimmerman RD, Grossman RI. Neuroradiology. Mosby. (2010) ISBN:0323045219. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 9. Griscom NT. Practical Pediatric Imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (1998) ISBN:0316494739. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 10. de Jong MC, Kors WA, de Graaf P et-al. The Incidence of Trilateral Retinoblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015;160 (6): 1116-1126.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.009 - Pubmed citation
- 11. de Jong MC, Kors WA, de Graaf P et-al. Trilateral retinoblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15 (10): 1157-67. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70336-5 - Pubmed citation
- 12. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK "WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4th Edition Revised" ISBN: 9789283244929