Citation, DOI & article data
Bone (skeletal) metastases are the third most frequent behind lung and liver metastases 6. They result in significant morbidity in patients with metastatic disease. Although the diagnosis is often straightforward, especially as in many cases there is a well-documented history of metastatic malignancy, sometimes they may mimic benign disease or other primary malignancies.
Osseous metastasis accounts for one of the 'M's in the popular mnemonic for lucent bone lesions FEGNOMASHIC.
Strictly speaking most "bone metastases" are bone marrow metastases, and metastases originating in the cortical bone are much less common 7. Indeed most of the metastases seen in cortical bone have directly invaded from the cancellous bone/bone marrow and on x-ray and CT are often not visible until cortical bone involvement has occurred ref.
The majority of bone metastases are asymptomatic. Symptoms can arise in a number of scenarios 1,3,6:
local bone pain
soft tissue mass resulting in:
direct compression of adjacent structures by extraosseous soft tissue mass (e.g. spinal cord compression)
bone marrow aplasia
In most cases, the diagnosis of metastatic disease is already known. If no known primary exists, or there is uncertainty regarding the diagnosis (e.g. no known metastases; unusual imaging appearances) then a bone biopsy can usually allow a definitive diagnosis.
Laboratory investigations are of limited value, but will often demonstrate increased serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase 1,3. An increase in hydroxyproline excretion may also be present 3.
The major route of spread of tumor to bone is hematogenous, although lymphatic spread is also seen (e.g. pelvic tumors spreading to para-aortic nodes, and then directly into bone cf. the more common hematogenous spread from the same tumors) 3. Although direct extension of tumors in bone is also not infrequently seen (e.g. oral cavity tumors into mandible, Pancoast tumors into first rib) this is not usually what is considered metastatic disease ref.
Regardless of the route of spread, metastases lead to both bone loss and bone formation, in varying amounts. The former is most likely due to direct enzymatic destruction and osteoclast activation. The latter can be due to stromal bone formation (formation of bone within tumor substrate; the case in prostate cancer metastases) or reactive new bone formation which represents the normal adjacent bone's response to the presence of tumor and is similar to callus formation 3.
Skeletal metastases invariably incite a mixture of bone resorption and bone formation and can thus take on one of three patterns, depending on the dominant process 6:
Additionally, metastases can have different morphological characteristics:
expansile (see: blow-out bone metastases)
Bone metastases account for 70% of all malignant bone tumors, and are seen in a vast number of primary cancers 1. This is due to not only the propensity of these tumors to metastasize to bone but also the fact that these are some of the most common tumors.
Primary tumors that commonly metastasize to bone include 7:
prostate cancer (most common in males)
breast cancer (most common in females)
lumbar spine more than thoracic spine and cervical spine
especially the posterior vertebral body, extending into the pedicles
Plain radiographs have low sensitivity (~50%) compared to bone scintigraphy (~80%, range 62-100%), CT (~85%, range 71-100%), and MRI (~90%, range 82-100%) 6,9. Bone scintigraphy is the preferred first-line imaging modality as a much smaller change in abnormal-to-normal bone is needed than for detection on plain radiographs 9.
As is the case with other bone lesions, skeletal metastases can be difficult to identify on plain films since extensive (~50%) bone loss is required before the density loss is radiographically visible 1,8.
In many other cases, the lesion is visible due to destruction of the cortex, or the presence of visible sclerosis.
It is important to note that, unlike primary bone tumors, in general metastases incite no or only limited periosteal reaction. The occasional exception to this general rule includes prostate cancer, some gastrointestinal malignancies, retinoblastoma and neuroblastoma 3.
CT does not have a role in primary assessment for the presence of metastases (except for difficult areas to image such as the spine) but is excellent at defining the extent of bony involvement and in helping assess the risk of pathological fracture.
Whole body MRI is not widely used but is highly sensitive to the replacement of normal bone marrow 2.
Bone scans are the most sensitive routine imaging modality to try and identify both sclerotic and lytic lesions 1. In most cases, they demonstrate increased uptake (hot spot) although occasionally (in very aggressive purely lytic lesions) a photopenic defect (cold spot) may be visible. A superscan is also a possible pattern where extensive diffuse metastatic disease results in a uniform increase in uptake 3.
Treatment and prognosis
In general, treatment can be thought of as systemic (e.g. chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) or local (e.g. radiotherapy or surgery). Pain management is also often an important part of managing patients with skeletal metastases.
A rule of thumb is that there is a high risk of pathological fracture if the lesion is painful, >2.5 cm in size and involves >50% of the bone. There are more formal classification systems, although increasing cortical involvement is probably the most important factor 4,5:
The median survival from the diagnosis of bone metastases is variable, ranging from 6 months in melanoma to 48 months in thyroid cancer 6.
There are, unfortunately, no specific features of metastases, although often the diagnosis is straightforward in the setting of known advanced malignancy and multiple lesions.
When no history of malignancy is present, but lytic lesions are multiple in an elderly patient, the main differential is multiple myeloma.
When no helpful features are present (in other words a solitary lesion in an otherwise supposedly well patient) one needs to consider numerous entities:
The differential can be narrowed according to specific appearances and locations:
- 1. Adam Greenspan, Gernot Jundt, Wolfgang Remagen. Differential Diagnosis in Orthopaedic Oncology. (2007) ISBN: 9780781779302 - Google Books
- 2. Nakanishi K, Kobayashi M, Nakaguchi K et al. Whole-Body MRI for Detecting Metastatic Bone Tumor: Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Images. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007;6(3):147-55. doi:10.2463/mrms.6.147 - Pubmed
- 3. Donald Resnick, Mark J. Kransdorf. Bone and Joint Imaging. (2005) ISBN: 9780721602707 - Google Books
- 4. Charles A. Rockwood (Jr.), David P. Green, Robert W. Bucholz. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. (2010) ISBN: 9781605476773 - Google Books
- 5. Piccioli A, Spinelli M, Maccauro G. Impending Fracture: A Difficult Diagnosis. Injury. 2014;45 Suppl 6:S138-41. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.038 - Pubmed
- 6. Macedo F, Ladeira K, Pinho F et al. Bone Metastases: An Overview. Oncol Rev. 2017;11(1):321. doi:10.4081/oncol.2017.321 - Pubmed
- 7. Shupp A, Kolb A, Mukhopadhyay D, Bussard K. Cancer Metastases to Bone: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Interactions with Bone Osteoblasts. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(6):182. doi:10.3390/cancers10060182 - Pubmed
- 8. O'Sullivan G, Carty F, Cronin C. Imaging of Bone Metastasis: An Update. World J Radiol. 2015;7(8):202-11. doi:10.4329/wjr.v7.i8.202 - Pubmed
- 9. Choi J & Raghavan M. Diagnostic Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy of Skeletal Metastases. Cancer Control. 2012;19(2):102-12. doi:10.1177/107327481201900204 - Pubmed
- 10. Saifuddin A, Tyler P, Rajakulasingam R. Imaging of Bone Marrow Pitfalls with Emphasis on MRI. BJR. 2022;:20220063. doi:10.1259/bjr.20220063 - Pubmed