Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created The Radswiki had no recorded disclosures.View The Radswiki's current disclosures
One or both fallopian tubes may be affected. A hydrosalpinx results from an accumulation of secretions when the tube is occluded at its distal end (obstruction of the ampullary segment) or both ends. On rare occasions, transient distention of the fallopian tubes occurs because of retrograde passage of blood from the uterus without complete distal occlusion.
pelvic inflammatory disease (e.g chlamydial or gonococcal infection): a hydrosalpinx is most commonly a sequela of adhesions from pelvic inflammatory disease
post-hysterectomy (without salpingo-oophorectomy)
unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx may also occur in women after a hysterectomy when only the fallopian tubes are left to protect the blood supply to the ovary
this is from the accumulation of tubal secretions caused by surgical blockage proximally and adhesion-related blockage distally
tubal malignancy: primary or secondary tumors of the fallopian tubes
thin- or thick-walled (in chronic cases)
elongated or folded, tubular, C-shaped, or S-shaped fluid-filled structure
distinct from the uterus and ovary.
Longitudinal folds that are present in a normal fallopian tube may become thickened in the presence of a hydrosalpinx. The folds may produce a characteristic “cogwheel” appearance when imaged in cross-section. These folds are pathognomonic of a hydrosalpinx. Indentations on the opposite sides of the wall is referred to as the waist sign which is a strong predictor of hydrosalpinx. The waist sign in combination with a tubular-shaped cystic mass has been found to be pathognomonic of a hydrosalpinx 9. Incomplete septa may also give a "beads on a string" sign.
Sometimes the dilated fallopian tube may not show longitudinal folds. If the elongated nature of these folds is not noted, they may be mistaken for mural nodules of an ovarian cystic mass. A significantly scarred hydrosalpinx may present as a multilocular cystic mass with multiple septa (often incomplete) creating multiple compartments. These septa are generally incomplete, and the compartments can be connected. However, with more pronounced scarring, differentiation from an ovarian mass may not be possible.
A hydrosalpinx may be seen incidentally at CT as a fluid-attenuation tubular adnexal structure, separate from the ovary. A simple hydrosalpinx is not accompanied by pelvic inflammation. The tubal wall may enhance following contrast.
MR imaging is the modality of choice for the characterization and localization of adnexal masses that are inadequately evaluated with ultrasound. A dilated fallopian tube is interposed between the uterus and ovary and demonstrates fluid signal intensity. Incomplete septa or folds can be seen. The mucosal plicae are usually effaced, and the tube wall is uniformly smooth and thin.
Signal characteristics of the dilated tube(s) include:
T1: typically hypointense although can be hyperintense if there is proteinaceous fluid
T1 C+ (Gd): the mucosal plicae and the tube walls may show mild enhancement
Will classically show a dilated fallopian tube, filling with contrast and with absence of free spillage.
Treatment and prognosis
tubal torsion: can be a late complication 4,7
General imaging differential considerations include
elongated paraovarian cyst
cystic ovarian neoplasm(s): identification of a separate ovary helps distinguish a hydrosalpinx from a cystic ovarian mass, an important distinction because malignancy is rare with an extraovarian cystic adnexal mass
bowel obstruction: at the pelvic level with dilated bowel loops: a dilated tube can be distinguished from pelvic bowel loops from the lack of peristalsis
dilated pelvic veins: pelvic veins can be recognized from the presence of moving low-level internal echoes, and blood flow may be detectable on Doppler interrogation
elongated pelvic perineural cyst
- 1. Rezvani M, Shaaban AM. Fallopian tube disease in the nonpregnant patient. Radiographics. 31 (2): 527-48. doi:10.1148/rg.312105090 - Pubmed citation
- 2. Kim MY, Rha SE, Oh SN et-al. MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. 29 (2): 495-507. doi:10.1148/rg.292085070 - Pubmed citation
- 3. Patel MD, Acord DL, Young SW. Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186 (4): 1033-8. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0091 - Pubmed citation
- 4. Russin LD. Hydrosalpinx and tubal torsion: a late complication of tubal ligation. Radiology. 1986;159 (1): 115-6. Radiology (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 5. Benjaminov O, Atri M. Sonography of the abnormal fallopian tube. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183 (3): 737-42. AJR Am J Roentgenol (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 6. Schiller VL, Tsuchiyama K. Development of hydrosalpinx during ovulation induction. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14 (11): 799-803. J Ultrasound Med (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 7. Shukla R. Isolated torsion of the hydrosalpinx: a rare presentation. Br J Radiol. 2004;77 (921): 784-6. doi:10.1259/bjr/36288287 - Pubmed citation
- 8. Burke, Liz. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. doi:10.1177/8756479307304111
- 9. Patel MD, Acord DL, Young SW. Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. (2006) AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 186 (4): 1033-8. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0091 - Pubmed
- 10. William L. Simpson, Jr, Laura G. Beitia, Jolinda Mester. Hysterosalpingography: A Reemerging Study1. (2006) RadioGraphics. 26 (2): 419-31. doi:10.1148/rg.262055109 - Pubmed