Usual interstitial pneumonia
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Yuranga Weerakkody had no recorded disclosures.View Yuranga Weerakkody's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Sebastian Röhrich had the following disclosures:
- contextflow GmbH, Medical advisor (ongoing)
These were assessed during peer review and were determined to not be relevant to the changes that were made.View Sebastian Röhrich's current disclosures
On imaging, usual interstitial pneumonia usually presents with a lung volume loss and an apicobasal gradient of peripheral septal thickening, bronchiectasis, and honeycombing.
This article will focus solely on the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern as a radiological or histopathological descriptor, for further discussion in the clinical aspects, please refer to the parental article on the specific underlying clinical diagnosis (e.g. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis).
In the past, the term usual interstitial pneumonia was used synonymously with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. However more recently the term idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has been applied solely to the clinical syndrome associated with the morphologic pattern of UIP, with the specific exclusion of entities such as non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) 1.
The histological diagnosis of UIP is based on temporal and spatial heterogeneity, which is the identification of fibrotic lesions at different stages (fibroblastic infiltrates, mature fibrosis, and honeycombing) within the same biopsy specimen and architectural distortion. Honeycombing, particularly if it involves more than 5% of the lung volume, is an almost 100% specific finding. On a typical biopsy, there are areas of normal lung alternating with interstitial fibrosis and honeycombing. The distribution of UIP characteristically is with an apicobasal gradient with basal and peripheral (subpleural) predominance, although it is often patchy.
Inflammation is absent or mild and mostly limited to the areas of honeycombing 1-12.
UIP pattern of interstitial lung disease can be seen in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or secondary to underlying systemic diseases. These would include:
connective tissue disorders (CTD associated UIP): falls under the broader spectrum of connective tissue disorder interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD)
rheumatoid arthritis: UIP is considered to be the dominant pattern in those with rheumatoid arthritis who have concurrent interstitial lung disease 3
asbestos-related interstitial lung disease: asbestosis 1
medications/drug toxicity: amiodarone lung
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (very rare)
In practice, the diagnosis is usually made in a multidisciplinary approach involving chest physicians, radiologists and pathologists with expertise in interstitial lung disease 12.
Plain film features are non-specific. While chest radiographs can be even normal in patients with very early disease, in advanced disease, it may show decreased lung volumes and basal fine to coarse reticulation. Usually, due to the more extensive involvement of the lower lobes, the major fissure is shifted inferiorly which is best seen on the lateral chest radiograph.
When describing imaging features, the term UIP pattern is often used, which has specific diagnostic criteria on HRCT 16. The positive predictive value of CT in the diagnosis of UIP is high and ranges from 70-100% 1. Similar to the pathology specimen, cross-sectional imaging also reveals heterogeneity, with patchy areas of fibrosis alternating with areas of normal lung 5.
Typical features include 1,5:
honeycombing: particularly if it involves more than 5% of the lung parenchyma, is highly specific for UIP. In general, UIP can be divided into two groups, those with <5% honeycombing and those with >5% honeycombing. It mainly reflects the stage and severity of the disease. Those with less than 5% honeycombing may pose diagnostic difficulty as differentiation from NSIP on imaging can be impossible; however, these still follow similar prognosis as other UIP patients 2
reticular opacities: in the immediate subpleural lung, often associated with honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis, with peripheral and lower lobe predominance, is considered a very good differentiating feature from patients with NSIP and concurrent emphysema 2
reticular opacity-to-ground glass opacity ratio: one or greater
ground-glass opacities: usually less extensive than the reticular pattern and almost never seen in isolation - usually happens in areas of reticulation or honeycombing
lung architectural distortion: which reflects lung fibrosis and is often prominent
lobar volume loss (predominantly lower lobes) is seen in cases of more advanced fibrosis
In recent times some authors have suggested certain signs within a UIP pattern more suggestive of it being due to connective tissue disorder interstitial lung disease over idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 22
straight-edge sign: isolation of fibrosis to bases with a sharp demarcation in the craniocaudal plane without substantial extension along the lateral margins of the lungs on coronal images
anterior upper lobe sign: concentration of fibrosis along the anterior aspect of the upper lobes with relative sparing of the other aspects of the upper lobes but with concomitant lower lobe involvement
exuberant honeycombing sign: exuberant honeycomb-like cyst formation within the lungs constituting greater than 70% of fibrotic portions of lung
Two leading societies have published criteria for the diagnosis of UIP based on HRCT findings:
Treatment and prognosis
In patients with UIP, areas of ground-glass attenuation tend to increase in extent or progress to fibrosis despite treatment 8,13. In those with more active inflammation involving the pulmonary interstitium, there is a faster progression of honeycombing in long-term follow-up 10. The average rate of progression of honeycombing in patients with idiopathic usual interstitial pneumonia according to one study was 0.4% of lung volume per month 7.
A key imaging differential on cross-sectional imaging would be:
hypersensitivity pneumonitis usually involves the mid and upper zones of the lung, and also the presence of centrilobular nodules and areas of air trapping are very useful hints to differentiate it from UIP
UIP cases are also thought to have honeycombing and peripheral or lower lung zone predominance of disease, and less likely to have micronodules
amiodarone lung fibrosis: helpful clues are the presence of hyperdense pulmonary nodules or hyperdense liver on a non-contrast CT
systemic sclerosis: presence of patulous esophagus and correlation with hand radiographs if available can be helpful
asbestosis: bilateral pleural plaques with or without calcification or peritoneal calcification are helpful in diagnosis
combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE): especially if there is added upper lobe-predominant emphysema
- 1. Lynch D, Travis W, Müller N et al. Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: CT Features. Radiology. 2005;236(1):10-21. doi:10.1148/radiol.2361031674 - Pubmed
- 2. Akira M, Inoue Y, Kitaichi M, Yamamoto S, Arai T, Toyokawa K. Usual Interstitial Pneumonia and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia with and Without Concurrent Emphysema: Thin-Section CT Findings. Radiology. 2009;251(1):271-9. doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080917 - Pubmed
- 3. Jeong Y, Lee K, Müller N et al. Usual Interstitial Pneumonia and Non-Specific Interstitial Pneumonia: Serial Thin-Section CT Findings Correlated with Pulmonary Function. Korean J Radiol. 2005;6(3):143-52. doi:10.3348/kjr.2005.6.3.143 - Pubmed
- 4. Kim E, Lee K, Johkoh T et al. Interstitial Lung Diseases Associated with Collagen Vascular Diseases: Radiologic and Histopathologic Findings. Radiographics. 2002;22 Spec No(suppl_1):S151-65. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.suppl_1.g02oc04s151 - Pubmed
- 5. Mueller-Mang C, Grosse C, Schmid K, Stiebellehner L, Bankier A. What Every Radiologist Should Know About Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Radiographics. 2007;27(3):595-615. doi:10.1148/rg.273065130 - Pubmed
- 6. Riha R, Duhig E, Clarke B, Steele R, Slaughter R, Zimmerman P. Survival of Patients with Biopsy-Proven Usual Interstitial Pneumonia and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(6):1114-8. doi:10.1183/09031936.02.00244002 - Pubmed
- 7. Akira M, Sakatani M, Ueda E. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Progression of Honeycombing at Thin-Section CT. Radiology. 1993;189(3):687-91. doi:10.1148/radiology.189.3.8080483 - Pubmed
- 8. Hartman T, Primack S, Kang E et al. Disease Progression in Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Compared with Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia. Assessment with Serial CT. Chest. 1996;110(2):378-82. doi:10.1378/chest.110.2.378 - Pubmed
- 9. du Bois R & King T. Challenges in Pulmonary Fibrosis X 5: The NSIP/UIP Debate. Thorax. 2007;62(11):1008-12. doi:10.1136/thx.2004.031039 - Pubmed
- 10. Lee J, Gong G, Song K, Kim D, Lim T. Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: Relationship Between Disease Activity and the Progression of Honeycombing at Thin-Section Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 1998;13(3):199-203. - Pubmed
- 11. Kim D, Collard H, King T. Classification and Natural History of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(4):285-92. doi:10.1513/pats.200601-005TK - Pubmed
- 12. Wuyts W, Cavazza A, Rossi G, Bonella F, Sverzellati N, Spagnolo P. Differential Diagnosis of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: When is It Truly Idiopathic? Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(133):308-19. doi:10.1183/09059180.00004914 - Pubmed
- 13. Otaola M, Quadrelli S, Tabaj G, Molinari L, Boscio V. Survival in Patients With Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) Secondary to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and Connective Tissue Diseases. Chest. 2011;140(4):995A. doi:10.1378/chest.1118639
- 14. Wells A. The Revised ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Diagnostic Criteria for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)--Practical Implications. Respir Res. 2013;14 Suppl 1(S1):S2. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S2 - Pubmed
- 15. Gruden J. CT in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Beyond. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(3):495-507. doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15674 - Pubmed
- 16. Wells A. The Revised ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Diagnostic Criteria for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)--Practical Implications. Respir Res. 2013;14 Suppl 1(S1):S2. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S2 - Pubmed
- 17. Lynch D, Newell J, Logan P, King T, Müller N. Can CT Distinguish Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis from Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(4):807-11. doi:10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676971 - Pubmed
- 18. Lynch D, Sverzellati N, Travis W et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Fleischner Society White Paper. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(2):138-53. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30433-2 - Pubmed
- 19. Chung J & Lynch D. The Value of a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Diagnosis of Usual Interstitial Pneumonitis and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Radiology, Pathology, and Clinical Correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(3):463-71. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15627 - Pubmed
- 20. Ebner L, Christodoulidis S, Stathopoulou T et al. Meta-Analysis of the Radiological and Clinical Features of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia (NSIP). PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0226084. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226084 - Pubmed
- 21. Mohning M, Richards J, Huie T. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: The Radiologist’s Role in Making the Diagnosis. BJR. 2019;92(1099):20181003. doi:10.1259/bjr.20181003 - Pubmed
- 22. Chung J, Cox C, Montner S et al. CT Features of the Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Pattern: Differentiating Connective Tissue Disease–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease From Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(2):307-13. doi:10.2214/ajr.17.18384 - Pubmed